In this Exchange, Daniel S. Harawa and Michael R. Ulrich examine the implications of United States v. Rahimi for the future of Second Amendment rights. Together, these pieces reveal how Rahimi exposes ...

The Medical-Legal Partnership (MLP) model promotes direct services and public policy advocacy by lawyers incorporated into medical teams. Drawing on personal experiences, this Essay proposes that to ...

The Medical-Legal Partnership (MLP) model promotes direct services and public policy advocacy by lawyers incorporated into medical teams. Drawing on personal experiences, this Essay proposes that to ...

This Essay explores how the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment doctrine perpetuates gender hierarchies and a male monopoly on lethal self-defense. It critiques the narrow “true man” framing that ignores ...

globalarbitrationreview.com/news/article/34038/icj-president-backs-croatia-slovenia-dispute http://perma.cc/M3K7-TFVE; Arman Sarvarian & Rudy Baker, Arbitration ...

The Yale Law Journal - Forum: Nonmajority Opinions and Biconditional Rules Nonmajority Opinions and Biconditional Rules abstract. In Hughes v. United Yale Law Journal - Whose Child Is This? Improving ...

The Roberts Court has methodically expanded the scope of Second Amendment rights. But in its first Second Amendment case involving a criminal defendant, United States v. Rahimi, the Court blinked.

Yale Law Journal - Cops and Pleas: Police Officers’ Influence on Plea Bargaining Cops and Pleas: Police Officers’ Influence on Plea Bargaining ...

Almost as much as ever, the law is bound up with domination and oppression. As usual, mainstream legal thought remains “one more variant of the perennial effort to restate power and preconception as ...